Oral Presentation Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Annual Scientific Meeting 2021

A randomised controlled trial investigating the ability for supervised exercise to reduce treatment-related decline in adolescent and young adult cancer patients. (#63)

Claire Munsie 1 2 3 , Jay Ebert 1 , David Joske 3 4 , Tim Ackland 1
  1. School of Human Science, The University of Western Australia, perth, Western Australia, Australia
  2. WA Youth Cancer Service, Nedlands, WA, Australia
  3. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, perth, Western Australia, Australia

Introduction: Exercise has been recognised as integral in managing a myriad of negative consequences in patients undergoing cancer treatment. However, its benefit within adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer cohorts remain relatively understudied. This study sought to evaluate the impact of an exercise intervention on mitigating the expected decline in fitness, strength, physical functioning, and quality of life (QOL) in AYAs undergoing cancer treatment.  

Methods: This prospective, randomised controlled trial (FiGHTINGF!T) allocated 43 participants (63% male, mean age: 21.1 years) to a 10-week exercise intervention (EG) or control group (CG) undergoing usual care. Pre and post intervention assessments included cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET), one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength, functional tests and quality of life (QOL) patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Data were analysed via linear mixed models and regression.

Results: While no significant group differences (p>0.05) were observed between groups, neither group significantly declined (p>0.05) in any outcome measure over the 10-week period. No significant (p˃0.05) strength or functional improvements were observed in the CG, though the EG demonstrated significant improvements in their 1RM leg press (p=0.004) and chest press (p=0.032), maximal push ups (p=0.032) and global QOL (p=0.011). The EG reported a significant increase in fatigue (p=0.014), while the CG reported significant positive changes in anxiety measures (p=0.005).  

Conclusion: The exercise intervention produced superior improvements in strength and global QOL, compared with the CG. Regardless of group allocation, enrolment in the exercise study appeared to mitigate the treatment-related decline expected in AYAs undergoing cancer treatment.